Bradley Martin Ball
1. In the New York Times, it is considered that the Bradley Martin ball was, "the most unique and beautiful entertainment ever enjoyed." The entire front page of the New York Times is about the ball, they assume readers think they want to know about what people wore, ate, and everything they did. The New York Times covered the Bradley Martin ball so heavily because it was an extravagant event and their perspective was that it was important and exciting.2. In The World of Society, the main perspective was about the
3. In Dr. Rainford's Advice, the perspective on the party was that it was completely ostentatious and a useless display of wealth. The people interviewed and mentioned in Dr. Rainford's advice all have negative things to say about the Bradley Martin ball and they aren't afraid to show their dismay about the waste of money and the social upheaval it caused. The clergyman thinks that the costly manifestations and elaborate displays of wealth were unnecessary and that the money used for the ball could have just as easily helped a charity rather than just being used for a social event. The newspaper published his views because it was new and different news to hear from all the people who had only positive things to say about the event, and they published it because he was a minister, aka a reliable and reputable source of information. The clergyman saw the ball as a problem because it was a waste of money.
4.
No comments:
Post a Comment